<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LCD Backlight Unit: Cost Reduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/</link>
	<description>Display News, Analysis, Research and Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment. I appreciate the additional information regarding DBEF and BEF. What do you think is the most cost effective way to improve light efficiency from the backlight to the front of the screen besides the current trend toward removing DBEF due mainly to the price? Thanks again for your encouragement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment. I appreciate the additional information regarding DBEF and BEF. What do you think is the most cost effective way to improve light efficiency from the backlight to the front of the screen besides the current trend toward removing DBEF due mainly to the price? Thanks again for your encouragement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anchoku</title>
		<link>http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>anchoku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 07:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2007/01/03/lcd-backlight-unit-cost-reduction/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>DBEF has polarization recycling where BEF is a prism sheet so there is still a benefit to using DBEF.  I would expect too much backlight gain can cause luminance uniformity issues when viewed too closely or from too wide an angle from normal.

I like your blog, by the way.  Keep up the good work and interesting posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DBEF has polarization recycling where BEF is a prism sheet so there is still a benefit to using DBEF.  I would expect too much backlight gain can cause luminance uniformity issues when viewed too closely or from too wide an angle from normal.</p>
<p>I like your blog, by the way.  Keep up the good work and interesting posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
