Comments on: LCD Monitor Specifications http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/lcd-monitor-specifications/ Display News, Analysis, Research and Consulting Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:58:48 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Specifications - EXPERTS ADVICE FORUM http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/lcd-monitor-specifications/#comment-823 Specifications - EXPERTS ADVICE FORUM Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:14:41 +0000 https://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/lcd-monitor-specifications/#comment-823 [...] Specifications LCD Monitor Specifications DisplayBlog [...] [...] Specifications LCD Monitor Specifications DisplayBlog [...]

]]> By: frailer http://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/lcd-monitor-specifications/#comment-822 frailer Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:13:59 +0000 https://displayblog.wordpress.com/2006/08/09/lcd-monitor-specifications/#comment-822 I am going through this whole scenario with displays for prepress. IMO, manufacturers are negligent in not being transparent about what panel tecnology they have behind them. I am wondering if I should try and get an S-IPS Dell, in the "cheaper" $600 range, [assuming I can confirm what panel it is; not always possible, I suspect]. Or go for an NEC 2090UXi, at around $1000+. Trouble is I have to justify the pricing with people who have no idea of the technology of TFT displays. I have now begun to "read" the common specs...i.e. slower response time = better because more likely S-IPS. 5 ms or less I asume to be Tn, so avoid looking at them. I am going through this whole scenario with displays for prepress. IMO, manufacturers are negligent in not being transparent about what panel tecnology they have behind them. I am wondering if I should try and get an S-IPS Dell, in the “cheaper” $600 range, [assuming I can confirm what panel it is; not always possible, I suspect]. Or go for an NEC 2090UXi, at around $1000+. Trouble is I have to justify the pricing with people who have no idea of the technology of TFT displays.
I have now begun to “read” the common specs…i.e. slower response time = better because more likely S-IPS. 5 ms or less I asume to be Tn, so avoid looking at them.

]]>